(no subject)

[nny]

Okay, so, I'm weird. I accept this. But I have to say that I find clothed people a hell of a lot sexier than naked people. It's a thing, alright? A glimpse of James Roday's clavicle through a slightly unbuttoned shirt does more for me than most porn.

I'm totally up for being proved wrong, though. What're your favourite naked/semi-naked pictures? Links/picspams in the comments are totally appreciated. Nay, verily welcomed. :D

Comments

[spuffyduds.livejournal.com]

I know what you mean! Totally naked pictures are just so...abrupt. I'm all--yep, there you are. Uh-huh. (I think part of that is from the fact that my earliest naked-man pic viewings were all in "Playgirl." Now, your average het guy looking at a picture of a woman in "Playboy" could easily fantasize "Mmmm, hot chick who WANTS me." But, at least in that era, Playgirl had this weird rule that the guys could NOT HAVE ERECTIONS. Which left me unable to fantasize past "Mmmmm, hot guy who is...wow, really not interested.")

That said, the occasional nearly naked really, REALLY works for me. I find these pictures both hot and hilarious, because he is not only very pretty, but also you get an idea of the self-mocking, deadpan-funny, VERY SMART-ness of him as well. Because, TEACUP.

teacup! (http://prettyboring.com/files/images/duchtrim.jpg)

teacup with giggles! (http://keris.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451956869e201053720daef970b-800wi)

And now I want tea... ;-)

[brewsternorth.livejournal.com]

HBO still blurs out the erections on the males in their after-dark programming. IDGI either. Gay porn seems to be the only place to find images or video of aroused males.

TEACUP! Agreed with you, it does capture the deadpan humour very well.

[torakowalski.livejournal.com]

I think I prefer three-quarters dressed pictures with just enough skin to indicate the possibility of getting the person naked. Totally naked photos just seem a bit pointless because if you can already see everything, what are you striving for?

(I am very, very fond of my new icon. *points*)

[villainny.livejournal.com]

I confess, I do not understand the sexiness of that man. I'm looking at SO many picspams lately, all bemused.

[brewsternorth.livejournal.com]

*squints* Would that be Alexander Starsgaard? Agreed with you, I think he's good-looking, but I don't find his particular good looks sexy.

/edit cuz i carnt spel

[apiphile.livejournal.com]

A variety of naked mens:



James Purefoy showcasing Crap Chest Hair:





Bebé Jepha.



JEPHA!



JEPHA.



Back when he used to wax.



Can make a bananahammock sexy.



QUINN AND BERT.

NAKED PEOPLE ARE AWESOME OKAY.

[torakowalski.livejournal.com]

In Generation Kill, he has this giant tattoo on his back; I'm a sucker for tattoos.

[villainny.livejournal.com]

Okay, fair: there was a guy at uni who had the most beautiful Buddhist back piece. I accept your argument.

Ish.

[villainny.livejournal.com]

Moooostly I just want pineapple now.

[villainny.livejournal.com]

IT JUST MAKES ME WANT TEA, OKAY.

XD

[apiphile.livejournal.com]

Were it not five years old, I would want THAT SPECIFIC PINEAPPLE.

[ladyflowdi.livejournal.com]

THIS. Though I long ago accepted I have total clothes kink, so I may not be the best person to ask :D

[mashimero.livejournal.com]

I'm the exact same way. I don't even know why, but like you said, seeing a bit of clavicle is really freaking hot.

[maggiebloome.livejournal.com]

Nah I totally agree. Clothes maketh the man, and occasionally the woman (I feel like most women are less silly-looking in the nude than men... but still usually better-looking clothed)

[brewsternorth.livejournal.com]

I think I once read somewhere that the costume designer on Star Trek TOS was very much of the same opinion; an "accident-prone" costume is sexier than a merely revealing one (which led to some off-the-wall, never mind off-the-shoulder, costume designs, but they were undoubtedly hot).

[batyatoon]

Hinting arouses the imagination more than straightforward showing or telling. And everybody knows the imagination is the most potent erogenous zone.

(Eroticism aside, though, the first statement holds true for nearly anything.)