(no subject)
Sep. 12th, 2009 10:13 amThe problem with SPN (the problem I'm going to talk about, because OMG there are so many problems) is that it's the Sam'n'Dean show. No big surprises there, right? Just, they've never managed to make it even slightly an ensemble. In NCIS - yes, I know, I'm so very obsessed - when one character is on the outs with another character they have someone else they can turn to about it, someone else who will offer them advice or make them laugh or even side against them, and the dynamics between the characters are always changing and shifting and it makes for interesting television.
In SPN we have... well. Sam and Dean. And then we have Bobby, who is... well he's kind of the gay best friend, right? He's there to listen to Dean angst and then
Their relationship really doesn't have the space to evolve all that much because we need them to be together or the show can't really exist. They've already strained it as far as they can, surely? So the other option is cycling back to where they started, rebuilding the brother relationship, and that's just annoying to have come so far just to get back to the beginning again. There's that Pratchett quote about how coming back to where you started from isn't the same as never leaving, but I'm not sure that I trust SPN to get that right, just now.
I think the mythology on this show is interesting and there's a lot of meta that I'd love to read about it, although I suspect they might get entirely too careful now that the possibility of God is on the table, so I'm half-hoping they don't mention him by name - plausible deniability and all. I am still really massively fond of watching it, seriously. But at the same time I'm mostly watching right now for the imaginary relationship I'm trying to formulate between Dean and Castiel. (Although, I'll be honest, it doesn't need much imagining. Thank you, Misha.)
Oh, and? One more thing. The fangirl thing was vaguely amusing, in that there are those sorts of fangirls and we can probably recognise an aspect of that in ourselves to an extent. But Kripke really needs to recognise that since it is the Sam and Dean show, these people are his bread and butter. And that line you walk, between 'joking with' and 'mocking'? That's way too thin. Way too thin. He needs to be a little more careful.
In conclusion: I suck at talking about things coherently, and I'm in it for the Misha.
Yup.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-12 01:41 pm (UTC)As for the fandom, dude, I can't do the Wincest thing, or even the RPS thing really, so the fandom holds zero interest for me. The show is just campy fun, and that's exactly how I watch it. If TV shows were food, Supernatural would be cherry cheesecake -- an absolute guilty pleasure, not at all necessary, and not something that has to be consumed every week. Last year I missed something like eight episode in the middle there somewhere, and just got caught up again recently. So, yeah.
(Also, the fangirl thing: Total LOL, even if I was horrified while LOLing. Oh, Kripke. I am convinced he trolls LJ, or at least the TWoP boards. Slash as mainstream: WEIRD.)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-12 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-12 06:45 pm (UTC)Yes. This.
Thanks, 'Nny, you've just put coherent words to what was bothering me about the fangirl. (The start of the badfic scene was funny, but past that, I just started to get uncomfortable. And while there are fans like that out there... The majority aren't. Sigh.)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-13 12:42 pm (UTC)and Dean runs off with Castiel to wash away the pain in vodka and sex.But you are very right, the way they've written/developed the series has really limited the emotional arcs they can explore because if they do lose that primary "Sam'n'Dean" dynamic they sort of lose the show. Hm.