Apr. 18th, 2009
(no subject)
Apr. 18th, 2009 03:58 pmYes, I'm spamming. Deal with it.
I've always wondered - is lessthanthree intensified if one puts lessthanfour, or is it lessthantwo? See, the examples I've seen have led me to believe that <4 is the accepted form of love overload, but <2 makes more sense than me, since three isn't a particularly large amount and less than it is obviously smaller, which'd mean - by my way of thinking - that the lower the number, the more desirable. Four is entirely too diluted a love. By that way of thinking, then, I suppose that the most desirable amount of love of all is <1 which looks a little like a particularly smug smile and could be, if you choose to go down a route that involves some combination of one of Zeno's paradoxes and an infinite sum*, something like infinity.
*as described thus: s(n) = 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 ... + 1/2^n, as n approaches infinity. It probably makes no logical mathematical sense, since it's something I Found On A Website Somewhere, but it pleases me no end.
I've always wondered - is lessthanthree intensified if one puts lessthanfour, or is it lessthantwo? See, the examples I've seen have led me to believe that <4 is the accepted form of love overload, but <2 makes more sense than me, since three isn't a particularly large amount and less than it is obviously smaller, which'd mean - by my way of thinking - that the lower the number, the more desirable. Four is entirely too diluted a love. By that way of thinking, then, I suppose that the most desirable amount of love of all is <1 which looks a little like a particularly smug smile and could be, if you choose to go down a route that involves some combination of one of Zeno's paradoxes and an infinite sum*, something like infinity.
*as described thus: s(n) = 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 ... + 1/2^n, as n approaches infinity. It probably makes no logical mathematical sense, since it's something I Found On A Website Somewhere, but it pleases me no end.