It's weird because despite my ridiculously untidy bedroom and my disorganisation gene and the fact that I'm quite ridiculously slack, I'm actually a bit of a pedant. I really love combing through canon and checking up on things, getting references, that kind of thing. Never anything related to my course, because I don't like my course (oh I should have done English lit) but things I'm fond of? Yes. Definitely.
So what I was thinking was that I'd make a journal purely for Good Omens resources. So, say, a post on Crowley's physical appearance with quotes from the book. Every quote concerning his appearance in one place, which could then be memoried. Lots of bits and pieces of canon - appearance, residence, family facts of the Them, all that sort of thing. I think it could be potentially useful, for me, and for anyone else who could choose to use it.
A couple of things that worry me. I vaguely wonder if it would be used as an excuse not to read the book, which is NOT something I want to encourage. Not even slightly. It's an amazing book, the book is why the fanfiction exists, and I wouldn't want that coming about as a result of this.
Secondly, I worry that it would appear prescriptivist and entirely too egotistical, which I never want to appear. I would like people to get it right because I love this fandom and I love the characters and sometimes I have to wince slightly at some assumptions or mistakes, but I'm completely not above making them or even encouraging them. I'm rather fond of Crowley's black wings in
milliways_bar, for instance, which are probably not what was intended in canon. But colour's not explicitly stated. So it CAN be argued. So I guess even if this was all done there's still room for interpretation, and I'm not creating or enforcing anything, just making things slightly easier.
Hmm.
I could use some opinions. Is this a good project to do (not until the summer, though, NO WAY)? Would anyone reading this find it useful? Should I really not bother?
If you're in GO fandom please, please respond to this.
So what I was thinking was that I'd make a journal purely for Good Omens resources. So, say, a post on Crowley's physical appearance with quotes from the book. Every quote concerning his appearance in one place, which could then be memoried. Lots of bits and pieces of canon - appearance, residence, family facts of the Them, all that sort of thing. I think it could be potentially useful, for me, and for anyone else who could choose to use it.
A couple of things that worry me. I vaguely wonder if it would be used as an excuse not to read the book, which is NOT something I want to encourage. Not even slightly. It's an amazing book, the book is why the fanfiction exists, and I wouldn't want that coming about as a result of this.
Secondly, I worry that it would appear prescriptivist and entirely too egotistical, which I never want to appear. I would like people to get it right because I love this fandom and I love the characters and sometimes I have to wince slightly at some assumptions or mistakes, but I'm completely not above making them or even encouraging them. I'm rather fond of Crowley's black wings in
Hmm.
I could use some opinions. Is this a good project to do (not until the summer, though, NO WAY)? Would anyone reading this find it useful? Should I really not bother?
If you're in GO fandom please, please respond to this.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:13 am (UTC)Personally I'd find it a godsend, because you know that I love to drabble spontaneously on your journal and Sophie's, and canon snippets would be wonderful when all I want to do is produce a brief moment of wit without rereading the entire book.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:25 am (UTC)*beat*
Go forth, I say! I do it all the time as well. Even if I don't type up the entire passage, I summerize the main points with a chapter and page reference.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:29 am (UTC)*goes looking for GO*
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:31 am (UTC)I may have an .rtf file of the entire text that I could send to you, if you wanted to use the 'find this word' function...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:38 am (UTC)I shall give you Brown Derby Jump, if you don't have it already.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:45 am (UTC)And for you - best CPD song in the world. (http://s34.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=1DDUPLSBUB5U92OS82GNBFGQ61)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:55 am (UTC)FURY.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 04:03 am (UTC)That sounds hideous :( Our government keep threatening things like that, but Canberra has an insane amount of bushland to spare.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 04:05 am (UTC)Although... isn't there one bit which says angels and demons both have white wings? Or am I thinking of a completely different fandom? *confused* *all her fandoms: melt into one*
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 04:26 am (UTC)*halo*
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 04:46 am (UTC)If you're worried about it taking up too much of your study time it doesn't have to be a one-person project; you could asign certain aspects of the book to different people.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 05:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 05:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 06:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 06:51 am (UTC)Too early for analysis or coherent thought, really
Date: 2005-05-13 06:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 07:39 am (UTC)Nobody who just hears about that book ever thinks it's a good idea, unless they're already a Pratchett fan or a Gaiman fan. They have to have the book PUT into their hands by a friend, who stands there and watches them read the first page or so before they're hooked in. Conclusion? People who don't read the book will not write the fandom.
And I think you should do the Lexicon.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 08:27 am (UTC)(Course, please note, I'm in a fandom that has over 30 RL years of canon, at this point. So in general, ANY resources in ANY fandom like this make me happy.)
(...Hell, I'm in Batman comics fandom. That's, like, 60 years? Something like that. No wonder it makes my head hurt. Damned comics.)
So. I slightly tilted PoV and all, but I still think it's a great idea.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 09:03 am (UTC)Tara Hill?
TARA HILL????
*weeps for the soul of the world*
Can this be STOPPED somehow?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 09:05 am (UTC)This opinion brought to you by someone who clings to the DT concordances as if to a lifeline, and who is eternally grateful for the WoT sites that cross-reference and allow concordance-type searching for characters and details and the like for TEN BOOKS of canon.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 10:39 am (UTC)And on the bit about Crowley's wings, when I read the book, I always saw them as black, and what really made me feel it was canon was in one of the chapter drawings, he is depicted with black wings. It's him hovering over the 'C' and watering the plant.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 10:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 07:34 pm (UTC)Fairly exactly what you've said above.
Date: 2005-05-13 11:13 pm (UTC)Whenever someone announces such a project, I look at them warily and narrow my eyes a bit. I've seen too many of these helpful little 'guides' start to include things like the writer's interpretation/biases and bits of fanon creep in... (and, in a couple cases, a spirit of extrapolation). Which are all fun things, of course, but not when they're pointed to as the fundamental fandomic foundation of facts because people just coming in to the fandom will believe [you]. And they are probably more likely to use it. I mean, I have a fairly good idea of what my Aziraphale looks like by now. (He doesn't, for example, wear glasses.)
If you're thinking about just a list collecting quotes... (1. Crowley's Appearance: 2. Adam's Appearance.) Yes, that sounds like an excellent resource. If you start to include qualifying statements, however, I shall sigh and, well, continue fairly exactly as before.
Re: Fairly exactly what you've said above.
Date: 2005-05-13 11:18 pm (UTC)Re: Fairly exactly what you've said above.
Date: 2005-05-13 11:35 pm (UTC)