nny: (everybody needs a slinky)
[personal profile] nny
I hate people.

Date: 2009-01-31 11:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] villainny.livejournal.com
They don't even look just thin, they look deformed. It's just so aggravating that some people don't even question what they are told to consider sexy. RARGH.

Date: 2009-01-31 11:39 am (UTC)
ext_11871: (Default)
From: [identity profile] weaverandom.livejournal.com
That is really really depressing D: and people actually buy them?

What is the POINT of making a "copy" of a famous arty thing if you copy it WRONG and put your own definition of "sexy" on it? BOTTICELLI IS TURNING IN HIS FREAKING GRAVE D: D: D:

Date: 2009-01-31 11:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] waywardradish.livejournal.com
UN-fun kitsch.

Date: 2009-01-31 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] villainny.livejournal.com
My squashy bits are offended.

I AM ALL SQUASH.

XD

Date: 2009-01-31 12:06 pm (UTC)
ext_21822: (misc / furious)
From: [identity profile] perardua.livejournal.com
*incoherent rage*

Date: 2009-01-31 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amanuensis1.livejournal.com
I didn't even recognize the Botticelli. I thought, "Oh, someone totally stole the hair from Botticelli there."

Date: 2009-01-31 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] liz666.livejournal.com
That's so fucked up

Date: 2009-01-31 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beadattitude.livejournal.com
Their heads look too big for their bodies. Not to mention the whole huge ICK factor.

Date: 2009-01-31 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] forest-rose.livejournal.com
Oh God. Just.... no words.

Date: 2009-01-31 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rheanna27.livejournal.com
Man, those are horrible. Horrible and WRONG. The originals are gorgeous and voluptuous; why would anyone ever want to mess with that? Yuk, yuk, YUK.

Date: 2009-01-31 02:46 pm (UTC)
ext_4055: (nani)
From: [identity profile] chandri.livejournal.com
I know. Seriously. WHAT THE HELL.

Date: 2009-01-31 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crysothemis.livejournal.com
*gags*

I've been reading about horrors of Photoshop (http://jezebel.com/gossip/photoshop-of-horrors/heres-our-winner-redbook-shatters-our-faith-in-well-not-publishing-but-maybe-god-278919.php), but this is just . . . augh!

"Let's rewrite the history of beauty as well as the current reality."

*gags some more*

Date: 2009-01-31 06:27 pm (UTC)
kerri: (*headdesk*)
From: [personal profile] kerri
-sighs- She has a point, in her follow-up post, but gah. :( I like renaissance art because I feel it's more representative of how a lot of healthy women look. the conception that healthy = stick thin really bothers me.

Date: 2009-01-31 06:55 pm (UTC)
ext_1718: (SGA Rodney bad day)
From: [identity profile] beeej.livejournal.com
That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. Even besides the whole stupid body image, "thinner is beautiful" issue, I find this to be like defacing the original work of art. It's degrading in so many ways.

Profile

nny: (Default)
Nny

November 2021

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
1415 16 17181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 3rd, 2026 02:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios